Seen rather than said personal referent acceptance and you may romantic relationship connection and you can efforts

Seen rather than said personal referent acceptance and you may romantic relationship connection and you can efforts

Lover tastes inside the online dating

Felmlee, D. H. (2001). Off attractive to terrible: Disenchantment with an enchanting lover. Sociological Perspectives, forty two, 263-280. [ Website links ]

Fiore, A great. T., & Donath, J. (2005). Homophily for the matchmaking: Whenever could you including anyone such yourself? CHI, appointment on person circumstances when you look at the measuring options. 1317-1374. [ Hyperlinks ]

Furman, W. (1985)patibility and you may incompatibility inside youngsters’ fellow and sis relationships. During the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you can incompatible relationships (pp. 61-87). New york: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Links ]

Gattis, K. S., Berns, S., Simpson, L. E., & Christensen, Good. (2004). Birds from a great feather or uncommon wild birds? Links certainly identity dimensions, similarity, and you will ily Psychology, 4, 564-574. [ Links ]

Gaunt, Roentgen. (2006). Few similarity and you will relationship pleasure: Try comparable spouses pleased. Log out of Identity, 74, 1401-1420. [ Backlinks ]

Goffman, Elizabeth. (1952). For the cooling the mark out: Specific part of type so you can failure. Psychiatry, fifteen, 451-463. [ Hyperlinks ]

Gonzaga, Grams. C., Campos, B., & Bradbury, T. (2007). Resemblance, overlap, and you will dating fulfillment into the matchmaking and you can married couples. Diary out-of Identification and Personal Therapy, 93, 34-48 Latina kvinnor. [ Website links ]

Personal Matchmaking, fifteen, 281-295

Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Echo, mirror: The significance of appears into the lifestyle. Albany: State College or university of brand new York Force. [ Links ]

Hatfield, Elizabeth., & Sprecher, S. (2009). Coordinating hypothesis. In the H. T. Reis & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Encyclopedia out of peoples relationship (Vol. dos, pp. 10651067). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. [ Links ]

Hatfield, Elizabeth., Traupmann, J., Sprecher, S., Utne, Meters., & Hay, J. (1985). Security and you will personal interactions: Present research. Inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationship (pp. 91-117). Nyc: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Website links ]

Hitsch, Grams. J., Hortacsu, An excellent., & Ariely, D. (2010). Coordinating and you may sorting for the dating. American Financial Remark, 100, 130-163. [ Website links ]

Houran, J., Lange, Roentgen., Rentfrow, J. P., & Bruckner, K. H. (2004). Would on line dating tests really works? An evaluation off preliminary proof having a publicized ‘predictive make of erican Record off Mindset, 6, 507-526. [ Links ]

Houts, Roentgen. Yards., Robins, Age., & Huston, T. L. (1996)patibility additionally the growth of preily, 58, 7-20. [ Links ]

Huston, T., Niehuis, S., & Smith, S. (2001). The early relationship origins regarding conjugal stress and you can breakup. Most recent Guidelines during the Mental Research, 10, 116-119. [ Backlinks ]

Ickes, W. (1985). Introduction. Inside W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you can in conflict relationship (pp. 1-7). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]

Ickes, W., & Charania, Meters. Roentgen. (2009)patibility. When you look at the H. T. Reis & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Encyclopedia out-of human relationships (Vol. step one, pp. 283-286). Newbury Playground, CA: Sage. [ Hyperlinks ]

Kalick, S. Meters., & Hamilton III, T. Elizabeth. (1986). This new complimentary theory reexamined. Journal regarding Identity and Personal Psychology, 51 , 673-682. [ Links ]

Karney, B. Roentgen., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). Brand new longitudinal course of marital high quality and you may stability: A peek at concept, measures, and you can look. Mental Bulletin, 118, 3-34. [ Links ]

Karney, B. Roentgen., & Bradbury, T. Letter. (1997). Neuroticism, marital correspondence, and the trajectory of marital pleasure. Journal away from Character and you can Social Mindset, 72, 1075-1092. [ Website links ]

Karney, B. Roentgen., & Bradbury, T. N. (2005). Contextual influences towards marriage: Effects to have policy and you may intervention. Current Recommendations in Psychological Research, fourteen, 171-174. [ Hyperlinks ]

Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, Age., Christensen, A good., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G. Peterson, D.R. (1983). Examining close dating. In H. H. Kelley, Age. Berscheid, A great. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Huston, Grams. Levinger. D. R. Peterson (Eds.), Personal relationship (pp. 20-67). New york: Freeman. [ Website links ]

Skriv et svar

Din e-mailadresse vil ikke blive publiceret. Krævede felter er markeret med *